Quantcast
OVERALL

0-0

PCT

0

CONF.

0-0

PCT

0

STREAK

W0

HOME

0-0

AWAY

0-0

NEUTRAL

0-0

Previews: Top 50 girls cross country teams (Nos. 36-40)

Posted On: Monday, July 31, 2006
By: alexanderscot
Previews: Top 50 girls cross country teams (Nos. 36-40)


By Colin Altevogt
Staff Writer

Prior to the start of the 2006 girls cross country season,
HoosierAuthority.com will bring you periodic previews of our Top 50 teams. Here
are Nos. 36-40 �

#40 Gibson Southern Titans
Bedford
North Lawrence
Semistate

2005
Results:
South
Knox Sectional: 1st place (37 points)
Pike
Central Regional: 3rd place (87 points)
Bedford
North Lawrence
Semistate:
11th place (272 points)

Returning
Runners (based on results from Bedford
North Lawrence
Semistate):
Lauren
Zeabart (10) – 16:04 (26th place)
Danielle
Mutz (10) – 16:29 (56th place)
Erika
Lamey (10) – 16:47 (69th place)
Vanessa
Johnson (12) – 17:05 (85th place)
Natalie
Chamberlain (10) – 17:45 (115th place)
Jessica
Rhodes (12) – 17:47 (117th place)

2006
Outlook:
Gibson
Southern may be the team of the future in the south with its top three runners
being sophomores. However, the future could be now as freshman to sophomore
year often produces the biggest improvement. If this happens, the Titans could
be looking to advance out of Bedford.

#39 Franklin Grizzly Cubs
Franklin
Central Semistate

2005
Results:
Edinburgh
Sectional: 3rd place (81 points)
Franklin
Central Regional: 4th place (116 points)
Franklin
Central Semistate:
13th place (354 points)

Returning
Runners (based on results from Franklin
Central Semistate):
Natalie
Grissom (10) – 15:31 (37th place)
Lyndsey
Wall (10) – 15:51 (60th place)
Stacie
Grissom (12) – 17:14 (130th place)
Kate
Wilson (11) – 17:30 (133rd place)
Kaitlin
Talley (10) – 17:42 (135th place)

2006
Outlook:
Like
Ben Davis, Franklin
ran a very good race in the regional only to experience a bit of a letdown the
next week. A young team full of freshmen last year, it is easy to understand
why that was so. The Grizzly Cubs could be the surprise team of the Indy area.
Junior Sarah Whitworth was not listed in the semistate results, but she ran
16:49 in the regional.

#38 Penn Kingsmen
New
Prairie Semistate

2005
Results:
South Bend
Riley Sectional: 1st place (71 points)
Culver
Community Regional 2nd place (79 points)
New
Prairie Semistate: 12th place (313 points)

Returning
Runners (based on results from New
Prairie Semistate):
Christine
Cummings (11) – 16:07 (44th place)
Whitney
Cullen (12) – 16:13 (48th place)
Crystal
Whiteside (11) – 17:14 (101st place)
Andrea
Korzan (10) – 17:16 (102nd place)
Alyssa
Priebe (10) – 17:18 (104th place)
Lisa
Larkin (12) – 17:43 (123rd place)

2006
Outlook:
Penn
returns six of last year’s top seven and should be looking to improve on last
year’s 12th-place semistate finish. The Kingsmen already have two
solid runners up front who should move into the Top 30 at New Prairie, but in
order to finish in the Top 10, Penn needs improvement in its pack. Having three
girls who can run together is a huge intangible. Going five deep in returnees
certainly doesn’t hurt, either.

#37 Huntington North Vikings
New Haven
Semistate

2005
Results:
Carroll
(Fort Wayne) Sectional:
3rd place (77 points)
Marion
Regional: 5th place (148 points)
New Haven
Semistate:
15th place (388 points)

Returning
Runners (based on results from New
Haven semistate):
Kara
Van Horn (12) – 15:30 (26th place)
Tyffany
Patrick (12) – 16:26 (74th place)
Megan
Stanley (12) – 16:59 (108th place)
Breanne
Hoffman (11) – 17:14 (115th place)
Samantha
Wright (10) – 17:26 (120th place)
Amy
Marion (11) – 17:28 (122nd place)

2006
Outlook:
Huntington
North brings back six of its top seven from last year’s team that qualified for
semistate. The Vikings have a good frontrunner in Kara Van Horn, who will be
looking to place in the Top 15 and advance as an individual to the state meet.
As a team, Huntington
has a great chance to finish in the Top 10 with moderate improvement from last
season.

#36 Warren Central Warriors
Franklin
Central Semistate

2005
Results:
Ben
Davis Sectional: 3rd place (89 points)
Franklin
Central Regional: 5th place (119 points)
Franklin
Central Semistate:
13th place (354 points)

Returning
Runners (based on results from Franklin
Central Semistate):
Carmen
Alejo (12) – 16:19 (88th place)
Latash
Williams (12) – 16:28 (96th place)
Kandi
Jenkins (11) – 16:29 (97th place)
Emily
Wright (10) – 16:34 (100th place)

2006
Outlook:
Warren
Central returns only four, but those coming back form a very impressive pack.
While the Warriors certainly don’t have enough firepower to advance to Terre Haute, they should
be a competitive team throughout the season. The girls need just one more to
join their ranks, which shouldn’t be a problem in a school of almost 4,000
students.

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • Google +
  • email
  • LinkedIn
  • RSS
  • StumbleUpon
  • Tumblr
Processing your request, Please wait....

Alerts

     

    Please log in to vote

    You need to log in to vote. If you already had an account, you may log in here

    Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.